
# 6015 byBsanctuary@... on Nov. 15, 2004, 7:45 a.m.
Member since 2021-10-03
In SSDig. 1014 Msg.#23 it was claimed that:
================================
This sounds like the Pavlovian knee-jerk position
which has been ingrained in all of us for most of the
past century.
I would not be the first to suggest that Communism
has never been tried.
-"Communism" is a label that has, in virtually all
cases, been co-opted by Totalitarian leaders
who have developed societies having very little
in common with the utopian goals advertised in
"Communist" literature.
[Again, I am reminded of an old TV spot...
One made shortly after the fall of the
Berlin Wall. -An E.Berlin woman was being
interviewed and was asked her true opinion
of Communism.
Despite everything, she claimed to be a true
believer... -However, she expected that
the communist "dream" probably would not
have been realized for at least another 50 yrs...]
[Come to think of it, I don't believe that
O'Neill's dream is likely to be realized for
for another 50 yrs, but..
-I guess there are "Communist Loonies, and
O'Neillian Lunies :-]
In America the word "Socialism" suffers from
the same prejudice, -that:
<<"My side is right and no one else has anything
to contribute, so we must crush the unbelievers
because they waste our time.">>
It is so bad that the most innocuous criticism
of our Capitalist system will be rebuffed as
[at best] a "waste of time".
I only bring this up because I think that where
Space Colonies are concerned, it might be
wise to seek some kind of 'middle ground'.
A number of times I have seen
"a better[Capitalist] life style"
offered as a reason for wanting
to move into space.
I believe it was Steve who said [in SSDig.#1014 Msg 10]
<flowing water, and playgrounds, and I'm inclined to believe
.. that oil rigs and company mining towns will be closer to the
realities of space-life than will Caribbean resorts.
If{Capitalist} profit is the driving motive, then {whatever} doesn't
contribute to profit is superfluous, and thus won't be part of
the design.
-And very few people would want to gather their families and
emigrate permanently to an oil rig.>>
The Oil Rig comparison is a good one for 'early days',
but I believe that by the time we are ready for a self-
replicating "Island 3" a better comparison would be the
Panama Canal Zone, whose U.S. Army imposed
government was perceived by its American inhabitants
as being "Socialist". -And the "Tropical Paradise" aspect aside,
was considered to offer a very pleasant, even utopian life style.
RKH
P.S. Which reminds me..
-Where are "Panama Bob" and P. Fernhoudt..? :-]

# 6016 bycapcartoonist@... on Nov. 15, 2004, 4:34 p.m.
Member since 2021-10-03
"R. K. Hardman" wrote:
================================ This sounds like the Pavlovian knee-jerk position
which has been ingrained in all of us for most of the
past century.
I would not be the first to suggest that Communism
has never been tried.
-"Communism" is a label that has, in virtually all
cases, been co-opted by Totalitarian leaders
who have developed societies having very little
in common with the utopian goals advertised in
"Communist" literature.>
There was a joke back in the 1980's in which Leonid Breshnev is showing his
mother around his Black Sea villa. They went from one opulent room to
another, and all the old lady could do was shake her head and mumble, "It's
so worrying."
Finally, Breshnev says to his mother, "What's wrong? Don't you like this
place?"
"Oh, it's lovely, Leonid. But I'm worried about what will happen to you if
the Bolsheviks should return."