
# 2403 byRavenart@... on Feb. 6, 2002, 2:40 a.m.
Member since 2021-10-03
Guys,
write this letter to my friends and famly today and I decided to copy it in
this post to you. You can forward it to other people if you want.
==================================
On 2001, we have witnessed a crime in the sky in September 11.
Now I want to direct your attention to another, more meaningful and postive
September 11 event, in 1993.
On that day, a milestone was made on the sands of a unused runway at White
Sands Missile Range, New Mexico. 11:12 am Mountain Time, a 39.66-foot rocket
stand on the platform. It fired and rose to 300 feet. It stopped and
hovered. There was no visual rocket flame, except for an orange flare once
in a while. It floated sideway 350 feet southwest, did it by swiveing its
gymballed rocket engines. The rocket was not louder than Boeing 737. It
hovered again. It lowered its landing gear. It descended to a soft landing
3.5 feet to the right of its launching point. It lasted 66 seconds. That was
the second test. Almost everything was done by on-board PC.
It costed only $60 million. The building team were only 100 people who build
the rocket in 21 months using old and off the shelf technology. 1960 Pratt &
Whitney RL-10 rocket engines. McDonnell Douglas MD-11 airliner's autopilot
and avionics. Honeywell Global Positioning System receiver and radar
alitimeter, off the shelf. Software that made the rocket smart. Some
hatch-closing springs and hinges came from Home Depot, Kmart, Trui-value,
Wal-Mart, and others. The rest (titanium pressure spheres, etc.) came from
aerospace junkyards on the West Coast. Flight Operations Control Center made
up of commerical PCs and run by only 3 people inside 18 wheeler trailer.
That rocket is the first true reuseable rocket without any throw-away parts.
It's also a single stage to orbit rocket, meaning there are no throwaway cans
such as you see on Space Shuttle. It's called McDonnell Dougalas Delta
Clipper DC-X. For the first time, a true spaceship can be build with private
money and be used again in the same day for commerical flights without a
single tax dollar. With it, you can FedEx a packet from Japan to New York in
just 43 mintues. It can be used to transport people to low earth orbit and
for a lot less than $20 million a ticket.
It's only one of many other models for true reusable spaceship. Others
included actual rockets such as Roton which have blades like helicoptor that
allow it to take off and land as a helicopter by using small rockets at the
tip of the blades in either direction. The rocket will fire only once it
reach upper air where the air get thin.
So why haven't we heard about it? Actually it was carried, briefly, by CNN
on that day and only then and now. After that, nobody noticed, even when the
flights was continued until 1995. The reason why nobody really noticed
(except for people at the White Sands) is that for a long long time we have
this mindset that demands that we see the travel to space as billions of
dollar's worth expensive project requiring government money. In this world
only the states can afford this tickets. This work fine for the governments
who want total monopoly over the space access and for the companies who like
getting fat and happy feeding off your tax dollars without regards for
anything that seems like productivity.
Do you want your taxes be wasted like this? Do you want to get from New York
to Japan in 40 mintues? Do you want that important product to be expressed
to your office in time for that make or brake meeting that can mean millions
in income for your business? Do you want to spend just $5,000 for a round
trip to a hotel in low earth orbit?
Then change your mindset, because on September 11, 1993, the new frontier is
fast becoming more affordable every day. And demand that your government
stop wasting your money and let the market improve your life with commerical
space transportation.
Carl Mullin

# 2404 byorbitalgardens@... on Feb. 7, 2002, 1:41 p.m.
Member since 2021-10-03
GOOD LETTER !

# 2405 byRavenart@... on Feb. 7, 2002, 3:49 p.m.
Member since 2021-10-03
Thanks Soren!

# 2406 byaglobus@... on April 11, 2002, 10:40 p.m.
Member since 2021-10-03
DC-X was a great project. It was a reusable, sub-sonic, sub-orbital
rocket. It was not very close to an orbital vehicle because it could
only reach very low speeds. The rocket equation tells us that the
energy needed is proportional to a quantity ***with the delta-v in the
exponent***, which is why sub-sonic is so much easier to do than
orbital.
that $60 million before World War II, although they weren't reusable.
DC-X was heard of frequently. It was in Space News and many other media
outlets. Most people I know in the aerospace business know of it. It
is not, and never was, a secret.
Ravenart@... wrote:
>
> Guys,
>
> I was reading "Halfway to Anywhere". What I learn so far have moved me to
> write this letter to my friends and famly today and I decided to copy it in
> this post to you. You can forward it to other people if you want.
> ==================================>
> On 2001, we have witnessed a crime in the sky in September 11.
>
> Now I want to direct your attention to another, more meaningful and postive
> September 11 event, in 1993.
>
> On that day, a milestone was made on the sands of a unused runway at White
> Sands Missile Range, New Mexico. 11:12 am Mountain Time, a 39.66-foot rocket
> stand on the platform. It fired and rose to 300 feet. It stopped and
> hovered. There was no visual rocket flame, except for an orange flare once
> in a while. It floated sideway 350 feet southwest, did it by swiveing its
> gymballed rocket engines. The rocket was not louder than Boeing 737. It
> hovered again. It lowered its landing gear. It descended to a soft landing
> 3.5 feet to the right of its launching point. It lasted 66 seconds. That was
> the second test. Almost everything was done by on-board PC.
>
> It costed only $60 million. The building team were only 100 people who build
> the rocket in 21 months using old and off the shelf technology. 1960 Pratt &
> Whitney RL-10 rocket engines. McDonnell Douglas MD-11 airliner's autopilot
> and avionics. Honeywell Global Positioning System receiver and radar
> alitimeter, off the shelf. Software that made the rocket smart. Some
> hatch-closing springs and hinges came from Home Depot, Kmart, Trui-value,
> Wal-Mart, and others. The rest (titanium pressure spheres, etc.) came from
> aerospace junkyards on the West Coast. Flight Operations Control Center made
> up of commerical PCs and run by only 3 people inside 18 wheeler trailer.
>
> That rocket is the first true reuseable rocket without any throw-away parts.
> It's also a single stage to orbit rocket, meaning there are no throwaway cans
> such as you see on Space Shuttle. It's called McDonnell Dougalas Delta
> Clipper DC-X. For the first time, a true spaceship can be build with private
> money and be used again in the same day for commerical flights without a
> single tax dollar. With it, you can FedEx a packet from Japan to New York in
> just 43 mintues. It can be used to transport people to low earth orbit and
> for a lot less than $20 million a ticket.
>
> It's only one of many other models for true reusable spaceship. Others
> included actual rockets such as Roton which have blades like helicoptor that
> allow it to take off and land as a helicopter by using small rockets at the
> tip of the blades in either direction. The rocket will fire only once it
> reach upper air where the air get thin.
>
> So why haven't we heard about it? Actually it was carried, briefly, by CNN
> on that day and only then and now. After that, nobody noticed, even when the
> flights was continued until 1995. The reason why nobody really noticed
> (except for people at the White Sands) is that for a long long time we have
> this mindset that demands that we see the travel to space as billions of
> dollar's worth expensive project requiring government money. In this world
> only the states can afford this tickets. This work fine for the governments
> who want total monopoly over the space access and for the companies who like
> getting fat and happy feeding off your tax dollars without regards for
> anything that seems like productivity.
>
> Do you want your taxes be wasted like this? Do you want to get from New York
> to Japan in 40 mintues? Do you want that important product to be expressed
> to your office in time for that make or brake meeting that can mean millions
> in income for your business? Do you want to spend just $5,000 for a round
> trip to a hotel in low earth orbit?
>
> Then change your mindset, because on September 11, 1993, the new frontier is
> fast becoming more affordable every day. And demand that your government
> stop wasting your money and let the market improve your life with commerical
> space transportation.
>
> Carl Mullin
>
--
Al Globus
CSC at NASA Ames Research Center
aglobus@..., (650) 604-4404
http://www.nas.nasa.gov/~globus/home.html
The dinosaurs weren't spacefaring. We are. I don't think that's an
accident. Maybe we are life's taxi to the stars.

# 2407 byRavenart@... on April 11, 2002, 11:08 p.m.
Member since 2021-10-03
In a message dated 4/11/02 6:44:50 PM, aglobus@... writes:
outlets. Most people I know in the aerospace business know of it. It
is not, and never was, a secret. >>
Actually, while many people in areospace have heard of it, most people who
have nothing to do with this industry don't. Ask a man on street what
reuseable spaceship he have heard of and he wlill say Shuttle and 95% of time
never say DC-X concept. As a result, most people get the idea that space can
be only paid with state money. They don't know that spaceship can be private
because they can be affordable. That was the point of my letter. Also, I
have see the fear in many people's words and imagination in which it seem
like the pie is getting smaller and violence seemingly endless, and this
letter was written to lock open their minds to endless possiblity!
Carl E. Mullin
visionary artist and entrepreneur
ravenart@...
www.ravenartstudio.com