OrbHab>SSI-List

Re: Try this ESP Experiment
# 20021 byvictoriatangoman on Aug. 6, 2004, 1:34 a.m.
Member since 2022-08-22

Ha ha. Let's see how long it takes for some of you programming
whiz's to figure out how the prediction rate is so high. LOL.

http://sprott.physics.wisc.edu/pickover/esp.html

TangoMan

# 20022 bypanamabob@... on Aug. 6, 2004, 4:16 a.m.
Member since 2022-08-22

Ha ha. Let's see how long it takes for some of you programming
whiz's to figure out how the prediction rate is so high. LOL.

http://sprott.physics.wisc.edu/pickover/esp.html

TangoMan

# 20023 byMitchell James on Aug. 6, 2004, 10:16 p.m.
Member since 2022-08-22

Hash: SHA1

| Ha ha. Let's see how long it takes for some of you programming
| whiz's to figure out how the prediction rate is so high. LOL.

| http://sprott.physics.wisc.edu/pickover/esp.html

| TangoMan

My 16 year old son spotted the hoax immediately. We both agreed that
what was truly scary was the explanations / comments put up on the site.
Mitchell James

Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBFEmL0doL2+r9FcgRAjZeAJ4/6L7E+3n/u5+USMmnu0PjyRo2dQCeLyK9
r2rhtfS6uj5BltTnJoYd1bo=
=RoOd

# 20024 byvictoriatangoman on Aug. 6, 2004, 11:37 p.m.
Member since 2022-08-22

--- In ssi_list@... Mitchell James

> My 16 year old son spotted the hoax immediately. We both agreed
> that what was truly scary was the explanations / comments put up
> on the site.

Yes indeed the comments were scary. I liked all of the eye
monitoring explanations. Or the quantum computing.

I think that this was an excellent demonstration of pyschology being
used to purposely deceive. People so trust what they see that
they'll concoct all sorts of explanations rather than question their
own perceptions. A comment in the spacesettlers group hypothesizes
whether the young who are more accustomed to a graphic world, rather
than a text world, will spot this more quickly because they focus on
the symbols that are missing rather than the selected card.

TangoMan

# 20025 byJim Sealy Jr. on Aug. 7, 2004, 1:03 p.m.
Member since 2022-08-22

The comments claiming it wasn't accurate 100% of the time are the
scariest.
Anyone who has figured it out knows why it will always be correct 100%
of the time.
Jim

# 20026 byBrett Sargeant on Aug. 8, 2004, 12:52 a.m.
Member since 2022-08-22

I think the comments were created by the creator of the quiz as part of
the set up of the con.
Brett

instead of choosing the chicken or the egg, why not do both ?