Authenticism drives the myth of real-estate value (was Mars)

I was certainly not "negating" what you said intentionally-my apologies, "autheticity" as I read it was not
perhaps as specific to the description of what I was saying. However, now that you point it out I see yes,
I guess it does fall under the definition of "authenticity".

My bad. My mind went right away to an image of strident yuppies seeking "experience" when you pointed to authenticity as the defining quality of worlds. I took it more as social commentary on your part ( as in lampooning the effette twits ever and always seeking the uncommon and the "unique" merely because they are so rather than any other intrinsic qualities or criteria of merit)

I stand corrected. :)

To: spacesettlers@yahoogroups.comFrom: hitssquad@...te: Mon, 26 May 2008 08:39:35 +0000Subject: [spacesettlers] Authenticism drives the myth of real-estate value, Part II (was Landscapes are)

--- In spacesettlers, Don DAnthony wrote:> > > > landscapes.> > > That is not the appeal of a planet. [...] authenticity [is]> experiencing the lanscape on a world vs a habitat the> notion of geologic time also comes in to play.That is what I said: authenticity.> To pick up a 400 million year old fossilAuthenticity.> to look at a river valley like the grand canyon and> realize the epochs that it has cut it's courseAuthenticity.> are all part of the experience, not merely the lay of the land.Authenticity, not merely the lay of the land, is part of the experience. You are simply repeating me.Repeating what another has said, with the implication that that other has not said it, is a form of negation. See #3:http://www.nononsenseselfdefense.com/profile.html#tendency_to_rape

Change the world with e-mail. Join the im Initiative from Microsoft.