Could Legal 'Loophole' Lead to

On 4/10/12 2:45 PM, brooksn wrote:

> As someone else pointed out when people started selling property on the
> Moon. With no way to use or enforce property rights, it is meaningless,
> in fact one critic, in response to the ridiculousness of 'selling' of
> moon plots, claimed the Sun and everyone was using his Sun without rent.

But this proposal is NOT like that, because this requires permanent
human habitation before any claim is recognized.

Tell that critic to go make a continuously inhabited colony on the
surface of the Sun, and maybe we'll listen to him after that!

- Joe