Beyond Fermi's Paradox

Larry here. Been into "UFOs" since the 1970s.

In thinking about this topic - if you must - I suggest you take off your engineer/scientist/technologist hat for a while and put on your historian/sociologist/psychologist hat (or something roughly comparable).

If some group has somehow learned how to travel around in space at sufficient speeds so that it doesn't take thousands of years to go to and fro, imagine what else they may have somehow learned to do.

If one could sum it up in one concept, it might be something like: Stealthy Control. This assumes the group has rivals, if only as factions within itself. Imagine what sort of skills in diplomacy, control of perceptions, control of personnel would need to be developed in order to gain stable dominance on a planet, then in a solar system, then beyond that solar system. These are skills that would be considered very advanced on earth, and that certain factions on earth would drool over.

Most of you in this group act as if you are not aware of the numerous reports of contact that already exist. To someone like myself, this looks like either willful ignorance or feigned ignorance. But let me assume that you have either not heard of these reports, or have heard of them, but only in a context so derisive that you were disinterested in pursuing them any further.

But this is where, in this subject, all the fun begins.

Now, most "rational" people will take the channeled, telepathic, even remote-viewed contacts to be total hoaxes. I don't think they are, but I do think that most of it is part of an elaborate disinfo campaign. Remember: Stealth Control.

But what about the military (or ex-military) boys and girls who claim to have seen these things with their own eyes? Still part of the same disinfo campaign? Could be, but I personally doubt it.

I doubt it because there is a whole other body of evidence that comes out of the general field of "psychology" that makes all these "wild stories" seem a little more plausible.

Start with the least heretical researcher, Ian Stevenson. His research has been quite carefully done. And it confirms (or "tends to support" as he might put it) the existence of past lives. Now, that opens a whole can of worms right there, doesn't it? It is indeed a very major can of worms. If we have "lived before," how many "befores" might there actually be?

Next we go to Robert T. James. An "amateur" hypnotherapist who did probably one of the most careful past life regression studies I have ever read about. (See eBook "Passport to Past Lives")

He studied over 100 people, and found several who could remember having grossly different body types, off-earth, somewhere in the distant past. He had not, however, perfected a dating technique.

Hubbard, however, did. He used a meter. It was a specially-built resistance bridge. His techniques used fully awake subjects. Recalls were meter-assisted. Dating of incidents was meter-assisted. His pool of subjects was at least 1,000.

Hubbard found consistent evidence for the existence of ET "space opera" societies IN THE PAST (usually millions of years ago). But are we to suppose they all just disappeared during the development of life on earth? Methinks not.

On top of this, we have Courtney Brown and his Scientific Remote Viewing (SRV). This is another fully-wake technique, but not meter-assisted, so again no good dates come out of it. His results, however, are similar. Mars was, or is, inhabited. ET exists in this solar system on "motherships." Stuff like this.

And so we get back to the military personnel who have reported seeing with their own eyes ET beings on earth and other evidence of contact.

I'm not ready to call them liars.

Per the reports, ET has chosen, when it has chosen, to work with military, governmental, and quasi-governmental groups on earth, mostly connected to the United States. Stealth Control. Birds of a feather flock together.

And that's where things stand. The "official" word is "no evidence of ET life forms." Right. So, it's a coverup. Just like all the others. It's a standoff.

There's a new "haves versus have-nots" game on this planet. The "haves" are the guys who have enough information to know what's really going on. Or at least they hope it's enough information. And the have-nots are the rest of us.

The "haves" want you to aspire to be one of them. A few of the "have-nots" want EVERYBODY to be haves. The rest don't seem to care that much. You know which faction I belong to.

- Larry