Nuke vs. SPS ( Population reduction isn't necessary for wilderness) Forum: Spacesettlers
Thread: Nuke vs. SPS ( Population reduction isn't necessary for wilderness)
# 13044 bysailorbarsoom@... on June 30, 2013, 3:59 p.m.
Member since 2021-10-03
--- In spacesettlers, b wrote:
> stations to solar power stations is a little difficult given
> the size disparity of current energy production.
> If we look across that graph at the 5 GW range, which is one
> of the typical sizes used for designing a SPS, an equivalent
> nuke would have around 3,000 staff.
>
> If we scaled up the numbers from the Antelope Valley project
> you'd have around 150, although the type of jobs and numbers
> required would be very different for a land based system
> compared to a space based one.
>
> Brett.
And in both cases, it's a LOT less than 60,000. SPS is NOT a scaled up ISS.