EM-Drive Forum: Spacesettlers
Thread: EM-Drive
# 13345 bylucioc@... on Aug. 14, 2014, 4:22 p.m.
Member since 2021-10-03
It would be not "reactionless" as it would react with the quantum vacuum.
"Propelantless" is a more accurate description.
2009 - http://www.centauri-dreams.org/?p=10624
Wheter those three alleged propelantless devices are actually using it - or
even really working - remains to be confirmed.
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 12:54 AM, sailorbarsoom@... [spacesettlers] <
spacesettlers@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
> This sounds a lot like a reactionless drive. I'd really like to have one,
> but wanting doesn't make it so. I suppose if this turns out to actually be
> something, we'll hear about it.Heck, even sex can't give you a reactionless
> drive.
>
Quantum vacuum propulsion exists as a theoretical prediction since at least 2009 -
http://www.centauri-dreams.org/?p=10624
Wheter those three alleged propelantless devices are actually using it - or even really working - remains to be confirmed.
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 12:54 AM,
sailorbarsoom@...
[spacesettlers]
<
spacesettlers@yahoogroups.com
>
This sounds a lot like a reactionless drive. I'd really like to have one, but wanting doesn't make it so. I suppose if this turns out to actually be something, we'll hear about it.Heck, even sex can't give you a reactionless drive.