discussion about artificial lighting for space colonies

Ramblings on the Future of Humanity: Lighting our Space Habitats
Ramblings on the Future of Humanity: Lighting our Spa...
In previous posts (Designing a Space Habitat and Farming in Space) Ive argued that we do not want to use natural sunlight to illuminate our habitat and gr...
View on
ramblingsonthefuture...
Preview by Yahoo

There are two key factors:
1) the lighting needed to efficiently grow crops is only about 72 PAR watts per square meter. That is, of course, NOT white light, but rather just the wavelengths that plants can efficiently use.
2) The white light that people need for normal illumination is normally far less bright than sunlight. Indeed, a brightly-lit store or office workspace is only about 1% as bright as direct sunlight. Normal "home" lighting levels are a fraction of that.
The only real complication is that for hybrid areas (parks and commons) we'll need a white light source (for human vision) that is also sufficiently bright (PAR) to grow plants (but we don't need them to grow rapidly) - and these are the only areas where your "15% of full sunlight" would apply, although 10% is likely more than adequate. Most plants can thrive in 5% of full sunlight applied 12 hours per day.
Yes, I believe our "farms" should be enclosed and optimized for plant growth (lighting wavelengths and timing, warmth, humidity, CO2), and largely kept separate from the open areas that should have more "normal" conditions (normal day/night cycles, comfortable temperatures and humidity, white light, etc.).