[OT] The Borg Forum: Spacesettlers
Thread: [OT] The Borg
# 1644 byxenophile2002@... on Aug. 14, 2001, 3:45 a.m.
Member since 2021-10-03
--- In spacesettlers@y..., "Combs, Mike" wrote:
> Borg concept never struck me much as seeming like a part of the
> Roddenberry vision. I think
Same here. That's why I asked. I was re-reading your 'if I were an
evil alien' thing when it struck me, "Ya know, that doesn't even
*sound* like Roddenberry!"
>the ending of ST:TMP seemed to establish Roddenberry as someone open
>minded about the prospect of humanity joining with its technology in
>order to create something greater than the sum of its parts.
The Binars seem more "Roddenberrian" than the Borg. Increased
capabilities, but not without some price. A sort of "benign Borg."
> In today's parlance, I think we'd call him a transhumanist.
Been reading up on transhumanism. Interesting. My GF thinks
it's "weird." But then, I rather like weird (as does she, in
truth... after all, she got me ^_~ ).
> The Borg seemed more like the standard Hollywood vision of
> technology: Keep technology at arm's length, lest it transform you
> into a pasty zombie.
Could be why there has been no Steve Austin movie, despite years of
rumors about it. Of course, he'd cost more than $6,000,000 now.
> Roddenberry was not particularly closely involved with STTNG past
> the first year. As I recall, the Borg were introduced in the 2nd
> season.
And both Data & the Binars in the first. Well, thanks, and I'll see
if I can find something concrete.
> Regards,
>
> Mike Combs
Xenophile (neither augmented nor assimillated... as of yet)