Audacious Tactics

> This might mean taxing authority goes to the UN rather than the US or EU
> and mineral royalties and income taxes, etc are paid to the UN for the
> benefit of all mankind, thus honoring the CHM provisions of the relevant
> treaties. The property is thus privately owned but taxed by another soveriegn.
I have one gripe with this, at least with the structure that the UN has now. Much as I support UN authority in some areas, the UN is not a democratically elected body. For this reason I do not think that they should have a direct source of income through taxes. For one thing, it would corrupt them for sure.