reality check

> I am dedicated to a space solution but if we are to make progress
> toward establishing SPSs and space colonies we must counter the
> arguments claiming that the cost of reaching space and establishing
> these facilities is 50x-100x higher than establishing alternatives on
> the ground. The solution is to first develop cheaper methods of
> reaching space.

This is not necessarily true. If building materials are launched from the
moon rather than Earth, costs may be somewhat less, especially if the moon
base is automated.

> The present estimates and negative reports are all based on rockets
> as the only way to reach space but as most members will know, there
> is already proven alternative in beamed energy that, virtually
> unfunded, is sitting, waiting to be developed.

Didn't I mention this last week?