nuclear disaster areas as rectenna sites

I also think it sets a bad precedent to locate rectennas in such areas. To be efficient and reduce transmission costs, rectennas need to be close to large population centres. How are the residents of Boston going to feel, for example, when there is a proposal to set up a rectenna farm in their area and the usual concerns about "radiation" arise and the only examples of installed systems are in areas poisoned by radiation or otherwise remote and unpopulated?