Nuclear plants: big, many, and popular (was Nuclear can also produce Forum: SSI-List
Thread: Nuclear plants: big, many, and popular (was Nuclear can also produce
# 22360 byWallach, Mark on April 13, 2009, 12:17 p.m.
Member since 2022-08-22
Funny, none of the cited surveys appears to have asked the respondents if they would like a nuclear power plant within 5-10 miles of their neighborhoods. I wonder why not?
> > What is unimaginable about 60,000 GWe of fleet nuclear capacity?
> Can we identify 60 neighborhoods in the U.S. that would welcome a nuclear power plant [...] let alone 6,000?
> finding "10,000-20,000" neighborhoods willing to invite in a nuclear power plant would be quite a trick.
A given nuclear power plant is limited to neither 1 GWe, nor only 1 reactor unit. 60,000 GWe could be provided by 6 10-TWe plants, 60 1-TWe plants, 600 100-GWe plants, 6,000 10-GWe plants, etc. Here, for example, is Palo Verdes, rated at 3.2 GWe:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palo_Verde_Nuclear_Generating_Station
The highest-capacity nuclear power plant in the world (so far) is:
http://www.leonardo-energy.org/drupal/node/766
"[...] Japan's Kashiwazaki nuclear plant, with 7 operating units and total capacity of 8,212 MW"
> finding "10,000-20,000" neighborhoods willing to invite in a nuclear power plant would be quite a trick.
What makes you think that?
http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf41.html#opinion
In March 2006 a national survey revealed [...] some 73% would find a new reactor at the nearest nuclear power plant acceptable.
In mid 2007 a survey of 1150 people living within 16 km of nuclear power plants in the USA, but without any personal involvement with them, showed very strong support for new nuclear plants. Over 90% thought nuclear energy was important for future supply, 82% favoured it now, 77% said that new plants should definitely be built and 71% said they would accept a new plant near them. There was an overwhelmingly favourable view of local nuclear plants, notably their safety. [...] The researcher concluded that "Nimby (not in my back yard) does not apply at existing plant sites because close neighbours have a positive view of nuclear energy, are familiar with the plant, and believe that the plant benefits the community."
[...]
A May 2008 survey (N)25) by Zogby showed 67% of Americans favoured building new nuclear power plants, with 46% registering strong support; 23% were opposed. Asked which kind of power plant they would prefer if it were sited in their community, 43% said nuclear, 26% gas, 8% coal.
[...]
A September 2008 Bisconti survey (N00) showed 74% in favour of nuclear energy, with four times as many strongly favouring as strongly opposing. 69% favoured definitely building new nuclear plants in the future and 75% thought that building new nuclear capacity at nuclear sites closest to where they live was acceptable.
[...]
A March 2009 Bisconti-GfK Roper survey showed that strong public support for nuclear energy was being sustained. In particular, 84% think nuclear will be important in meeting electricity needs in the years ahead, 84% support licence renewal for nuclear plants, 76% believe utilities should prepare to build more nuclear plants, 87% and 81% respectively approve of tax credits and federal loan guarantees to encourage new build, 70% would support adding a new reactor at the nearest nuclear plant