Planet-Sized, Non-Rotating Habitats [needs nanotech] Forum: Spacesettlers
Thread: Planet-Sized, Non-Rotating Habitats [needs nanotech]
# 5813 bylucioc@... on Oct. 21, 2004, 5:38 p.m.
Member since 2021-10-03
Just stressing: supposing that UFog is possible, then you could make
that bigger or smaller than Earth. Size would not be an issue. In
theory, you could have even a "Little Prince's Planet" for just one
person.
seriously that they will ever be *viable* options :-) would be:
- An outer spheric grid of ultra-powerful magnets (perhaps made of
meta-stable metallic hydrogen or other sort of
magnetic/superconducting "unobtenium") that would push everything
against the inner "crust" shell through diamagnetism. Of course
ferromagnetic objects and electronics would likely be a problem under
this scenario.
- An inner black whole or chunck of quark matter in the center of the
"crust" sphere, massive enough to produce *actual* gravity on its
surface.
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 23:43:43 -0000, Xenophile wrote:
>
> OK, so what you do is to build a hollow sphere the size of the
> Earth. Make the shell of whatever works best (probably doesn't have
> to be diamondoid), maybe 1 000 metres thick, with maybe another 1 000
> metres or so of dirt, rocks, etc. on top of that. Stuff the whole
> thing with Utility Fog (maybe just a layer 10 000 metres thick).
> Fill the rest with air. Do not rotate. The UFog pushes people, etc.
> against the inner shell (or rather, against the dirt and such).
>
> Heck, you can probably put the UFog right against the shell, and let
> it form the rocks, water, and so forth. Even "wildlife" could be
> simulated to a high degree of realism. Want dinosaurs? You got
> dinosaurs.
>
> But even if the UFog was relatively "stupid," it aught to be able to
> do the basic job of "hold everything down."
>
> Xenophile (taking off on a flight of fancy, yes, but still, it seems
> doable, given UFog)
(...)