Redesigning O Neill cylinders Forum: Spacesettlers
Thread: Redesigning O Neill cylinders
# 6284 bybronto@... on Jan. 17, 2005, 10 p.m.
Member since 2021-10-03
> Costea Andrei wrote:
>> Rotating cylinders also require too much atmosphere, of which 78%
>> needed to be shipped up from earth in the form of nitrogen.
Gilliland) has smaller pressure canopies over the "land" areas of the
cylinder, with much lower pressure at the windows and the axis.
millenial70 wrote:
> . . . Do any of the asteroids have nitrogen that could be used?
More likely in comets (as ammonia).
>> Studying all the possible shapes for the colony, we found that the
>> torus is the most suitable shape for the space settlement habitat.
> It might be the most suitable as far as materials usage is concerned.
> But it still might be unworkable because of the human factors
> involved: possible feelings of claustrophobia and "cabin fever", that
> such a habitat might induce. When someone wants to go outside, there
> might not be enough of an "outside" for them to go to in order to feel
> right. They'll feel like they're stuck inside a large office building
> with no way out.
An opposite argument has been made: we need to know we can go somewhere
else, and see other sights. A planet hides the surrounding country with
its convexity and with hills; a hollow convex body hides nothing; in a
torus most of the territory is hidden by the sky.
--
Anton Sherwood, http://www.ogre.nu/
obsolete since 21 December 2001